| Rank | Most active authors |
 | 1 |
|
|
 | 2 |
|
|
 | 3 |
|
|
 | 4 |
|
|
 | 5 |
|
|
 | 6 |
|
|
 | 7 |
|
|
 | 8 |
|
|
 | 9 |
|
|
 | 10 |
|
|
 | 11 |
|
|
 | 12 |
|
|
 | 13 |
|
|
 | 14 |
|
|
 | 15 |
|
|
 | 16 |
|
|
 | 17 |
|
|
 | 18 |
|
|
 | 19 |
|
|
 | 20 |
|
|
 | 21 |
|
|
 | 22 |
|
|
 | 23 |
|
|
 | 24 |
|
|
 | 25 |
|
|
|
Little elephants
By
churchmouse
| Posted:
25 March 2010
|
|
I want you to listen to me, because there is something that I need to tell you.
I suppose that I should of told you before, but you're old enough now to make your own decisions, and it is better that you hear this from me rather than from someone else.
I want to give you a couple of pieces of advice. And if you heed them well, they will keep you in good stead for the rest of your life. So listen carefully.
Never, ever, let anyone talk you into employing an elephant.
No doubt you may have heard other people saying that elephants are cool, or hip, or groovy or whatever the current word for fashionable is, but don't believe them. There have been more lies told about elephants than anything else.
For example: You may have heard the phrase "Elephants never forget". This is not only untrue, but the exact opposite of what is the case. Elephants are always forgetting things. Why do you think that they are all called Jumbo?
No, I know that there was one called Dumbo, but that was a typing error, and it wasn't a real elephant, it was a cartoon one. So it doesn't count.
They are all called Jumbo because none of them can remember each other's names, and rather than have an embarrassing encounter with another elephant that they may have gone to school with, who's name they have forgotten, they all use the same one. That is how forgetful they are. Next time that you see one, ask it what it's post-code is. I can guarantee you that it would have forgotten.
Not that you are likely to come across an elephant as they are notoriously shy creatures. If you do see one, it will probably be trying to hide behind a coffee table or a standard lamp in a pathetic attempt to make itself inconspicuous.
Admittedly, it is quite difficult for elephants to hide. And the bigger ones tend to live in the kitchen cupboards of the biggest houses as the cupboards are bigger than the ones we have. The little ones however. The ones that are about the size of a cat. They will normally live under your bed, and cover themselves with fluff so that you can't see them.
Of course all elephants are nocturnal. And when you are asleep, they creep out and raid the fridge for food. They have a very sweet tooth. Which is the reason why the ice cream cone that you were saving disappeared before you could get to it.
You are probably asking yourself why little elephants would chose to live under your bed, when there are so many other places they could live. Wolverhampton for example.
Well, you may have been told at school that elephants come from warm climates.
This is about the only true thing ever said about elephants. As a result they do feel the cold quite badly. Particularly on their trunks - You know how your nose feels cold in the winter, - well it is the same for elephants, and as your bedroom is nice and warm most of the time, it is an ideal place for them to stay.
On some nights when they are feeling a bit chilly, after they have returned from raiding the fridge, they will occasionally steal a sock from your drawer to wear over their trunks. Of course when they take them off they forget where they have put them, and so the next time they are cold they will pinch another one from you.
Which brings me to my second piece of advise for you. When you are getting dressed in the morning and can't find both socks. Try looking under the bed!
All articles on this website by
churchmouse are copyright ©churchmouse and should not be reproduced
without the author's prior written consent. All opinions are the opinions of their
respective authors and are not necessarily the opinions of The Writers' Circle.
| Comments | |
|
|
Thanks bellisimo. I normally manage to bugger it up somewhere along the line and have almost come to depend on people being kind enough to point out the things that I have accidentally missed out / inserted /misspelled etc.
Thanks for pointing it out.
|
|
|
I've heard about a group of people of the same religion with the same last name all over their country.
Oh, yeah, Jumbo was the name.
Hey, what happened to the peanuts? What's with those socks stuff with peanuts?
I swear, you and your stories would be head high and as tall as the brothers Grimm and their fairy tales.
I think if you gave your stories or your characters a name, they might just become allegorical, symbolic or archetypal - - like Dumbo, Snow White, Rapunzel, Rumplestiltskin
The Churchmouse's Tales could be the name of the book.
Kudos
|
|
|
Churchmouse,
Now I know why elephants can't jump. They'd hit their heads on the bed's underside. :-)
In addition to the *should of* error, there's another one which wouldn't readily present itself.
>>> "You are probably asking yourself why little elephants would chose to live under your bed, when there are so many other places they could live."
It is always a great way to use *would* as an auxiliary when the content of the clause is being doubted, supposed, feared true, or describing a past action as being habitual; giving it a subjunctive mood.
This is not the error; in fact, it is a superior way to write and describe a scene without committing yourself and letting the reader deduce to reach their own conclusions, which inherently would also be your own proposition (as the author) by means of reasoning out something that would not ever be feasible . . . imagine an elephant under the bed. (But, then again, the reader would say, "hey, why not?"
Okay, enough BS. :-)
The error is *chose*. Although *would* is in the *past*, the phrase or word that follows *would* would always be in the present or present perfect tense. And with a past participle to form the present perfect, past perfect, and future perfect tenses indicating completed action - as in "would have tried". (Maybe there are exceptions, but I haven't found an exception to this rule).
Here's the revised *sentence*.
"You are probably asking yourself why little elephants would choose to live under your bed, when there are so many other places they could live."
I know, (you would understand :-), I wouldn't want to go through a spaghetti route to point it out but this piece of sentence would cement the whole scene. And you would notice that after this *sentence*, you would have assumed that the reader would now be on your side as you would have them realize that they would have tried looking under their beds for missing socks. Here, you successsfully would have taken the reader to jump to your side of the equation so you could proceed to your second piece of advise.
Well done. This is classic *Churchmouse Tales*. And this is why you write well.
Cheers,
Grampa
|
|
|
Thanks mnmnl, Grampa.
First of all thank you mnmnl for mentioning peanuts. I had not thought of them before, but if elephants were responsible for putting holes in socks in order that they can suck peanuts through them it would explain why you never see a hole forming in a sock, it just seems to happen overnight. So I will probably insert a peanut line in the finished article.
Thank you Grampa for pointing out the chose thing. It was actually a spelling mistake and should have been choose originally, but I had a most interesting half hour while I worked out the grammar explanation. You were perfectly correct of course, and it was a useful exercise for me to read your comments.
Thanks again guys.
|
|
Kudos
|
|
|
From 2 votes
|
|
|
|
|
Total posts: 435
|
|
Roles:
Writer
|
|
|
|
FRANCE
|
|
|
Heating engineer by day. Writer of whimsical rubbish by night. Trying to replace the former with the latter. A few articles previously published in club/in-house magazines. Couple of short stories recently ... (Read more)
|
|
|
|